@article{oai:hokuriku.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000046,
 author = {松本, 和彦 and Matsumoto, Kazuhiko},
 issue = {37},
 journal = {北陸大学紀要, Bulletin of Hokuriku University},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {he purpose of this paper is to interpret and clarify critical/transcendental characteristics presented in Kant’s Rechtslehre (Metaphysical Elements of Justice) and philosophy of law, especially his theory of property. In other words, the systematic position of the book in Kant’s critical philosophy is discussed here. Kant’s Rechtslehre and philosophy of law were conventionally thought to have nothing to do with or even to contradict his critical philosophy; they were negatively treated as marginal in his whole system of critical philosophy. It was generally and strongly believed that Kant’s Rechtslehre and philosophy of law did not fully reflect or, in extreme cases, conflicted with his critical/transcendental method. However, in Germany, the debate over this issue has intensified again since 1970s. In this paper, I intend to examine the recent research situation on this issue here in Japan and look chronologically at the situation of the dispute in German speaking countries.},
 title = {カント法哲学の批判的・超越論的性格ーその解釈論争をめぐってー},
 year = {2014},
 yomi = {マツモト, カズヒコ}
}