@article{oai:hokuriku.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000580,
 author = {福江, 充 and Fukue, Mitsuru},
 issue = {47},
 journal = {北陸大学紀要, Bulletin of Hokuriku University},
 month = {Sep},
 note = {In April of 2018 the author acquired a two-scroll Tateyama mandara through Yahoo!
Japan’s auction website, Yafuoku! It arrived from an antique-art dealer in Shizuoka City
with no additional information about its provenance. As it is currently in the author’s
collection, it is herein referred to as the Fukue-ke Tateyama mandara.
The two scrolls are probably remounted fragments that survive from what was
originally a set of four hanging scrolls. The fragments depict scenes of Tateyama’s “hell”
and of a ritual that was held in Tateyama’s foothills called the Cloth-bridge Consecration
(Nunobashi kanjō-e). The placement of that ritual within the overall composition indicates
that it is an Ashikuraji-type Tateyama mandara. Closer inspection reveals resemblance to
the oldest extant Tateyama mandara versions, leading the author to speculate that it too
is a relatively old Tateyama mandara.
In this article the author first analyzes the composition and iconography of the
Fukue-ke version. Then he compares it to the Raigōji, Tsuboi-ke A, and Konzōin Tateyama
mandara versions in order to establish its historical placement among these early
Ashikuraji-type Tateyama mandara.
The Raigōji Tateyama mandara has long been regarded as the oldest among
Ashikuraji-type Tateyama mandara versions. This comparison of early representations of
the Cloth-bridge Consecration Rite, however, suggests that the Fukue-ke Tateyama
mandara may be an even older work., 新出の立山曼荼羅『福江家本』の構図や図像を詳しく分析し、次にその内容をもとに、これまで最も古いとされてきた芦峅寺系立山曼荼羅の『來迎寺本』、『坪井家A本』、『金蔵院本』の構図や図像と相互に比較し、それらの異同の意義を考察しながら、芦峅寺系立山曼荼羅の諸本における同作品の史料としての位置づけを提示した。その結果『福江家本』が、芦峅寺系立山曼荼羅諸本のなかで、前掲の『來迎寺本』などの３作品よりも、古い成立作品であることが判明した。},
 pages = {57--76},
 title = {立山曼荼羅『福江家本』と最も古い芦峅寺系立山曼荼羅３作品との比較研究},
 year = {2019},
 yomi = {フクエ, ミツル}
}